Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Test Only: coderrabit changes #214

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Conversation

Kishan-Dhakan
Copy link
Member

@Kishan-Dhakan Kishan-Dhakan commented Mar 25, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added auto-reply configuration for enhanced chat interaction.
    • Introduced new public functions for better transaction management.
    • Implemented a new case for "local" network configuration to improve network handling.
    • Added a new option to fix sequence mismatches in client options for more reliable transactions.
  • Refactor

    • Updated function visibility and refactored transaction building for improved code usability and error handling.
  • Chores

    • Updated configuration to focus on best practices, security, and performance in code reviews.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Mar 25, 2024

Walkthrough

These updates enhance the codebase by focusing on testing practices, security, performance, and user customization. Public access is granted to previously private functions in the chain module, a new function for transaction signing is introduced, and error handling is refined. Additionally, network configuration now supports local setups, and client options offer a fix for sequence mismatches, improving flexibility and reliability in network interactions and client configurations.

Changes

Files Summary
.coderabbit.yaml Added instructions for Go file test suggestions, review of best practices, security, performance, and auto-reply config.
client/chain/chain.go Made prepareFactory public as PrepareFactory, added buildSignedTx, refactored BuildSignedTx, improved error handling.
client/common/network.go Updated LoadNetwork for "local" network configuration.
client/common/options.go Added FixSeqMismatch to ClientOptions, with initialization and setting function.

🐰✨

In the land of code and binary,
A rabbit hopped, making history.
With every line, and every tweak,
Making the codebase strong, not weak.

Bugs beware, for you'll find no feast,
In this garden, performance increased.
🌟🚀


Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 34 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 25.10%. Comparing base (8a251c5) to head (8e00488).

Files Patch % Lines
client/common/network.go 0.00% 15 Missing ⚠️
client/chain/chain.go 0.00% 11 Missing ⚠️
client/common/options.go 0.00% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #214      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   25.01%   25.10%   +0.09%     
==========================================
  Files          17       17              
  Lines        3022     3011      -11     
==========================================
  Hits          756      756              
+ Misses       2234     2223      -11     
  Partials       32       32              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 8

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8a251c5 and 8e00488.
Files selected for processing (4)
  • .coderabbit.yaml (1 hunks)
  • client/chain/chain.go (9 hunks)
  • client/common/network.go (1 hunks)
  • client/common/options.go (2 hunks)
Additional comments: 6
.coderabbit.yaml (2)
  • 2-4: The instructions for reviewing Go files are clear and align with the PR objectives. This should help ensure that reviews focus on best practices, security, and performance.
  • 10-10: Enabling the auto-reply feature in chat configurations is a straightforward change that should improve interaction efficiency.
client/common/options.go (3)
  • 22-25: The addition of the FixSeqMismatch field to the ClientOptions struct is clear and follows Go conventions.
  • 31-33: Initializing the FixSeqMismatch field to true by default in DefaultClientOptions is a clear and sensible default setting.
  • 68-72: The OptionFixSeqMismatch function provides a clear and idiomatic way to set the FixSeqMismatch field via a ClientOption.
client/common/network.go (1)
  • 179-193: The addition of the "local" network configuration case in the LoadNetwork function is well-implemented, with sensible defaults and appropriate use of the DisabledCookieAssistant for a local environment.

// if the account number and/or the account sequence number are zero (not set),
// they will be queried for and set on the provided Factory. A new Factory with
// the updated fields will be returned.
func (c *chainClient) prepareFactory(clientCtx client.Context, txf tx.Factory) (tx.Factory, error) {
func PrepareFactory(clientCtx client.Context, txf tx.Factory) (tx.Factory, error) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The change to make PrepareFactory public is noted and aligns with the PR objectives. However, it's important to ensure that this function is covered by tests, especially now that it's part of the public API.

Would you like assistance in creating test cases for this function?

@@ -605,7 +605,7 @@
res, err := c.broadcastTx(c.ctx, c.txFactory, true, msgs...)

if err != nil {
if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "account sequence mismatch") {
if c.opts.FixSeqMismatch && strings.Contains(err.Error(), "account sequence mismatch") {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of handling for "account sequence mismatch" in SyncBroadcastMsg is a practical improvement. Ensure this error handling path is covered by tests to verify its effectiveness.

Would you like assistance in creating test cases for this error handling scenario?

@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@
func (c *chainClient) SimulateMsg(clientCtx client.Context, msgs ...sdk.Msg) (*txtypes.SimulateResponse, error) {
c.txFactory = c.txFactory.WithSequence(c.accSeq)
c.txFactory = c.txFactory.WithAccountNumber(c.accNum)
txf, err := c.prepareFactory(clientCtx, c.txFactory)
txf, err := PrepareFactory(clientCtx, c.txFactory)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of PrepareFactory within SimulateMsg is a logical improvement. It's important to ensure this behavior is covered by tests to verify its correctness.

Would you like assistance in creating test cases for this behavior?

@@ -668,7 +668,7 @@
c.txFactory = c.txFactory.WithAccountNumber(c.accNum)
res, err := c.broadcastTx(c.ctx, c.txFactory, false, msgs...)
if err != nil {
if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "account sequence mismatch") {
if c.opts.FixSeqMismatch && strings.Contains(err.Error(), "account sequence mismatch") {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of handling for "account sequence mismatch" in AsyncBroadcastMsg is consistent with the changes in SyncBroadcastMsg and improves resilience. Ensure this error handling path is covered by tests.

Would you like assistance in creating test cases for this error handling scenario?

func (c *chainClient) BuildSignedTx(clientCtx client.Context, accNum, accSeq, initialGas uint64, msgs ...sdk.Msg) ([]byte, error) {
txf := NewTxFactory(clientCtx).WithSequence(accSeq).WithAccountNumber(accNum).WithGas(initialGas)
return c.buildSignedTx(clientCtx, txf, msgs...)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The delegation of transaction building to a new buildSignedTx function in BuildSignedTx improves modularity. It's important to ensure both functions are covered by tests to verify their correctness.

Would you like assistance in creating test cases for these functions?


func (c *chainClient) buildSignedTx(clientCtx client.Context, txf tx.Factory, msgs ...sdk.Msg) ([]byte, error) {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of the buildSignedTx function enhances modularity by encapsulating the logic for building signed transactions. Ensure comprehensive tests cover the simulation logic and error handling within this function.

Would you like assistance in creating test cases for this function?

}

txBytes, err := clientCtx.TxConfig.TxEncoder()(txn.GetTx())
txBytes, err := c.buildSignedTx(clientCtx, txf, msgs...)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The integration of buildSignedTx within broadcastTx is a positive change that improves modularity. Ensure that the interaction between these functions and the error handling logic is covered by comprehensive tests.

Would you like assistance in creating test cases for this integration and error handling?

@@ -925,7 +887,7 @@
log.Debugln("broadcastTx with nonce", sequence)
res, err := c.broadcastTx(c.ctx, c.txFactory, true, toSubmit...)
if err != nil {
if strings.Contains(err.Error(), "account sequence mismatch") {
if c.opts.FixSeqMismatch && strings.Contains(err.Error(), "account sequence mismatch") {
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of handling for "account sequence mismatch" in runBatchBroadcast is consistent with similar improvements in other functions. Ensure this error handling path is covered by tests to verify its effectiveness.

Would you like assistance in creating test cases for this error handling scenario?

@Kishan-Dhakan Kishan-Dhakan deleted the test-coderrabit-changes branch March 25, 2024 15:18
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants